GOAT Index

Two legends at a time. Thousands of votes. One ranking.

0Voters
0Matchups judged

Who is the greatest women's basketball player of all time?

Who's greater?

Standings

Filter voters

    About you

    Optional

    This lets the standings split by age and region, so you can see where generations and continents disagree. Votes are anonymous: no name or email is ever collected.

    Women's basketball GOAT ranking: the fans' top 20

    Based on 1 head-to-head votes from 1 fans. Updated live.

    1. A'ja Wilson Forward · Aces · rating 1592 · 1–0
    2. Diana Taurasi Guard · Mercury · rating 1500 · 0–0
    3. Sheryl Swoopes Forward · Comets · rating 1500 · 0–0
    4. Cynthia Cooper Guard · Comets · rating 1500 · 0–0
    5. Tamika Catchings Forward · Fever · rating 1500 · 0–0
    6. Candace Parker Forward · Sparks, Sky · rating 1500 · 0–0
    7. Sue Bird Guard · Storm · rating 1500 · 0–0
    8. Lauren Jackson Center · Storm · rating 1500 · 0–0
    9. Maya Moore Forward · Lynx · rating 1500 · 0–0
    10. Breanna Stewart Forward · Storm, Liberty · rating 1500 · 0–0
    11. Elena Delle Donne Forward · Sky, Mystics · rating 1500 · 0–0
    12. Lindsay Whalen Guard · Lynx · rating 1500 · 0–0
    13. Tina Thompson Forward · Comets · rating 1500 · 0–0
    14. Sylvia Fowles Center · Sky, Lynx · rating 1500 · 0–0
    15. Cheryl Miller Forward · USC · rating 1500 · 0–0
    16. Yolanda Griffith Center · Monarchs · rating 1500 · 0–0
    17. Caitlin Clark Guard · Fever · rating 1500 · 0–0
    18. Napheesa Collier Forward · Lynx · rating 1500 · 0–0
    19. Teresa Weatherspoon Guard · Liberty · rating 1500 · 0–0
    20. Lisa Leslie Center · Sparks · rating 1408 · 0–1

    Popular Women's basketball matchups

    Questions

    Who is the Women's basketball GOAT according to fans?

    A'ja Wilson currently leads the GOAT Index Women's basketball ranking after 1 head-to-head votes from 1 fans.

    How is the ranking calculated?

    Fans vote on head-to-head matchups between two legends. Every vote counts like a game result, and a Bradley–Terry model (the idea behind chess ratings) turns thousands of results into one ranking, where beating a highly rated legend counts for more than beating a long shot.

    More GOAT debates

    How the ranking works. Every head-to-head vote is a result, like a game. The standings use a Bradley–Terry model, the same idea behind chess ratings: beating a highly rated legend counts for more than beating a long shot. Ratings are shown on a chess-style scale centred on 1500.

    One vote per matchup per person. If you see a pairing again in another session your new answer replaces the old one, so nobody can stuff the ballot by repeating a matchup.

    Anonymous by design. No account needed. A quick bot check from Cloudflare runs once when you arrive, and your votes are tied to a random ID kept in your browser, not to your name or email. Privacy policy.

    Photo credits

      Photos come from Wikimedia Commons under the licenses listed. Each links to its source page.